Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 30070 for de.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 30070 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment is de novo. See Smith, 212 Wis. 2d at 232. However, in order to perform our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147113 - 2015-08-24
of summary judgment is de novo. See Smith, 212 Wis. 2d at 232. However, in order to perform our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147113 - 2015-08-24
COURT OF APPEALS
on a lesser-included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36035 - 2009-03-30
on a lesser-included offense is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Gomaz, 141 Wis. 2d 302
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36035 - 2009-03-30
Frontsheet
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55543 - 2010-10-13
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55543 - 2010-10-13
R.A. Nielsen v. State of Wisconsin Medical Examining Board
of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14226 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark W. Roob
, are both legal questions, which we review de novo. State v. Krawczyk, 2003 WI App 6, ¶10, 259 Wis. 2d 843
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
, are both legal questions, which we review de novo. State v. Krawczyk, 2003 WI App 6, ¶10, 259 Wis. 2d 843
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6366 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a constitutional error is harmless is subject to de novo review. See State v. Rockette, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
Whether a constitutional error is harmless is subject to de novo review. See State v. Rockette, 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26
the terms of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo.” Id., ¶5. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52592 - 2010-07-26
State v. Paul Venema
and application of the statute to a set of facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4386 - 2005-03-31
and application of the statute to a set of facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4386 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
. Second, we “decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings require suppression.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo, though the statute is construed broadly in favor of initial joinder. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20
that we review de novo, though the statute is construed broadly in favor of initial joinder. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20