Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 35439 for divorce forms.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 35439 for divorce forms.
State v. Steven W. Biever
and read the Informing the Accused form. Biever submitted to the chemical breath test and did not repeat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15983 - 2005-03-31
and read the Informing the Accused form. Biever submitted to the chemical breath test and did not repeat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15983 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
its expertise or specialized knowledge in forming the interpretation; and (4) the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83148 - 2012-05-30
its expertise or specialized knowledge in forming the interpretation; and (4) the agency’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83148 - 2012-05-30
State v. Carrie L. Drew
in a holding area and read the Informing the Accused form. Drew refused to submit to an Intoxilyzer test.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12801 - 2005-03-31
in a holding area and read the Informing the Accused form. Drew refused to submit to an Intoxilyzer test.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12801 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
: there was an intentional misrepresentation; the misrepresentation occurred before the contract was formed; and the fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105408 - 2013-12-09
: there was an intentional misrepresentation; the misrepresentation occurred before the contract was formed; and the fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105408 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and understood the plea forms; and (4) Hutchison’s testimony at the motion hearing was not credible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245558 - 2019-08-21
and understood the plea forms; and (4) Hutchison’s testimony at the motion hearing was not credible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245558 - 2019-08-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
colloquy, including the court’s references to the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383122 - 2021-07-01
colloquy, including the court’s references to the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383122 - 2021-07-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
which formed the basis for the revocation of Murphy’s probation. Second, just as the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137101 - 2017-09-21
which formed the basis for the revocation of Murphy’s probation. Second, just as the sentencing court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disclosure form. No. 2024AP1910 3 On cross-examination, Jeffrey acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098095 - 2026-03-31
disclosure form. No. 2024AP1910 3 On cross-examination, Jeffrey acknowledged that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098095 - 2026-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
” to that improper factor and the improper factor “formed part of the basis for the sentence.” State v. Alexander
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110710 - 2026-04-29
” to that improper factor and the improper factor “formed part of the basis for the sentence.” State v. Alexander
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110710 - 2026-04-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
” to that improper factor and the improper factor “formed part of the basis for the sentence.” State v. Alexander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110710 - 2026-04-29
” to that improper factor and the improper factor “formed part of the basis for the sentence.” State v. Alexander
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1110710 - 2026-04-29