Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 65143 for or b.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 65143 for or b.
State v. Cory L. Brown
, 466 U.S. at 694. B. Counsel’s decision to reject the trial court’s mistrial offer ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4814 - 2005-03-31
, 466 U.S. at 694. B. Counsel’s decision to reject the trial court’s mistrial offer ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4814 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
) of .08 or more, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (2007-08), second offense. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50202 - 2010-05-19
) of .08 or more, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (2007-08), second offense. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50202 - 2010-05-19
COURT OF APPEALS
no transcripts in the record. The Austin court stated that “[b]ecause neither party has furnished a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62333 - 2011-04-05
no transcripts in the record. The Austin court stated that “[b]ecause neither party has furnished a transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62333 - 2011-04-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enticement, the now-codified greater latitude rule applies. WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b)1. By making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
enticement, the now-codified greater latitude rule applies. WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b)1. By making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
COURT OF APPEALS
Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jennifer B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66812 - 2011-06-27
Department of Human Services, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Jennifer B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66812 - 2011-06-27
State v. Donald C.
with Donald C. and that Donald C. said that he could not make it to court in the afternoon “[b]ecause he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6706 - 2005-03-31
with Donald C. and that Donald C. said that he could not make it to court in the afternoon “[b]ecause he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6706 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516, 538, 544 N.W.2d 406 (1996); Wis. Stat. § 901.03(1)(b). ¶8 Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04
. Williams, 198 Wis. 2d 516, 538, 544 N.W.2d 406 (1996); Wis. Stat. § 901.03(1)(b). ¶8 Whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38802 - 2009-08-04
State v. John W. Dunn
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11976 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ANGELA B. BARTELL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11976 - 2005-03-31
City of Manitowoc v. Michael L. McKenna
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This is a one-judge appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2695 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This is a one-judge appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2695 - 2005-03-31
Stephen C. Solomon v.
an informed decision regarding representation in it violated SCR 20:1.4(a) and (b),[6] and telling the client
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17076 - 2005-03-31
an informed decision regarding representation in it violated SCR 20:1.4(a) and (b),[6] and telling the client
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17076 - 2005-03-31