Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 26001 - 26010 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Michael Hupy & Associates v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.
. Michael Hupy & Associates, S.C., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6090 - 2017-09-19
. Michael Hupy & Associates, S.C., appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6090 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Reynosa’s pretrial suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39222 - 2014-09-15
issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Reynosa’s pretrial suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Branko Cvorovic
-CR 2 the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3080 - 2017-09-19
-CR 2 the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence of the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3080 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Domingo Ramirez
on the old Stevens/Richards rule was nonetheless admissible. Ward, 2000 WI at ¶62. The trial court applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2278 - 2017-09-19
on the old Stevens/Richards rule was nonetheless admissible. Ward, 2000 WI at ¶62. The trial court applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2278 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Todd D. Duerst
conviction. Id. The trial court dismissed her claim at summary judgment on issue preclusion grounds. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20
conviction. Id. The trial court dismissed her claim at summary judgment on issue preclusion grounds. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7467 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, prior to the trial date, she had moved for a continuance and demonstrated good cause for her motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03
, prior to the trial date, she had moved for a continuance and demonstrated good cause for her motion. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26650 - 2006-10-03
Brown County v. Heather M. A.
not freely, voluntarily, or knowingly give up her right to a trial. ¶6 The court informed Heather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6318 - 2005-03-31
not freely, voluntarily, or knowingly give up her right to a trial. ¶6 The court informed Heather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence warranting an evidentiary hearing on his motion for a new trial. We conclude that Gilliam has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09
evidence warranting an evidentiary hearing on his motion for a new trial. We conclude that Gilliam has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786480 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Slaughter
that the trial court correctly denied Slaughter's motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8516 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court correctly denied Slaughter's motion. Accordingly, we affirm. We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8516 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
constitutional rights to confrontation and to a fair trial. We disagree, and affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06
constitutional rights to confrontation and to a fair trial. We disagree, and affirm. Background ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83380 - 2012-06-06