Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26021 - 26030 of 74763 for judgment for us.
Search results 26021 - 26030 of 74763 for judgment for us.
Frontsheet
was convicted on a no contest plea of two counts of unlawful use of a telephone. The judgments of conviction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59825 - 2011-02-08
was convicted on a no contest plea of two counts of unlawful use of a telephone. The judgments of conviction
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59825 - 2011-02-08
Karen T. Runge v. Allstate Insurance Company
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL P. SULLIVAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10126 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL P. SULLIVAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10126 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Wangerin was charged with first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Wangerin was charged with first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
Karen T. Runge v. Allstate Insurance Company
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL P. SULLIVAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10126 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MICHAEL P. SULLIVAN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10126 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Wendi Muehls-Sussman v. Dennis Greenwood
granted summary judgment in their favor. No(s). 00-2513-FT 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3033 - 2017-09-19
granted summary judgment in their favor. No(s). 00-2513-FT 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3033 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Wangerin was charged with first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
summarily affirm the judgment of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. Wangerin was charged with first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923479 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court agreed. This appeal followed. ¶6 “We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128650 - 2017-09-21
court agreed. This appeal followed. ¶6 “We review summary judgments de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128650 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232038 - 2019-01-09
on appeal. Therefore, we summarily affirm the judgments of conviction. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232038 - 2019-01-09
CA Blank Order
Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. John W. Dunisch appeals a judgment convicting him of burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118470 - 2014-08-05
Brown, C.J., Reilly and Gundrum, JJ. John W. Dunisch appeals a judgment convicting him of burglary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118470 - 2014-08-05
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31