Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26031 - 26040 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26031 - 26040 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. De Zonia, 63 Wis. 2d 429, 432, 217 N.W.2d 377 (1974). Secors contends Claim VIII is a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346310 - 2021-03-16
. De Zonia, 63 Wis. 2d 429, 432, 217 N.W.2d 377 (1974). Secors contends Claim VIII is a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346310 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
WI 2
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15
they are clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59081 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Sveum
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Mata, 199 Wis.2d 315, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12804 - 2017-09-21
a question of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. See State v. Mata, 199 Wis.2d 315, 319
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12804 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Barritt v. Lowe, 2003 WI App 185, ¶6, 266 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Barritt v. Lowe, 2003 WI App 185, ¶6, 266 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156714 - 2017-09-21
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156714 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11916 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11916 - 2017-09-21
2009 WI APP 63
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). No. 2023AP2377-CR 9 ¶18 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25
Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). No. 2023AP2377-CR 9 ¶18 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25
COURT OF APPEALS
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Enea v. Linn, 2002 WI App 185, ¶11, 256 Wis. 2d 714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140864 - 2015-04-27
We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Enea v. Linn, 2002 WI App 185, ¶11, 256 Wis. 2d 714
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140864 - 2015-04-27