Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26031 - 26040 of 57370 for id.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. If a new factor is present, the trial court then “determines whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=982982 - 2025-07-15

[PDF] Michael F. Dubis v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16087 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92615 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
the case to go to the jury in the absence of expert testimony. Id. at 378-79 (citation omitted). ¶13
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30343 - 2007-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
the need for the search against the invasion the search entails.” Id. (citing Terry, 392 U.S. at 21). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100352 - 2013-08-05

General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Group
a trial court’s decision on such a question. See id. The general rule
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12377 - 2005-03-31

Spickler Enterprises, Ltd. v. Department of Revenue
the application of estoppel. Id. Estoppel is not applied as freely against governmental agencies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12220 - 2005-03-31

State v. Vincente Murillo, Jr.
is on the defendant to offer a fair and just reason, id. at 583-84, 469 N.W.2d at 171, and the reason must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11982 - 2005-03-31

Reuben Granado v. Sentry Insurance
to the statute’s plain language. Id. In the absence of statutory definitions, this court construes all words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14941 - 2005-03-31

Eugene Stern v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services
between the facts alleged and the legal theory advanced.’”[3] Id. (quoted source omitted). Neither
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11290 - 2005-03-31