Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26031 - 26040 of 64166 for records.
Search results 26031 - 26040 of 64166 for records.
CA Blank Order
of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that the order should be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131933 - 2015-05-04
of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that the order should be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131933 - 2015-05-04
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106755 - 2014-01-09
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106755 - 2014-01-09
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91196 - 2013-01-02
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91196 - 2013-01-02
State v. Joseph L. Kohls
806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
806 (Ct. App. 1996). The record must show that the trial court exercised its discretion and stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2687 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court determined that his claims were barred. Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
court determined that his claims were barred. Upon consideration of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858738 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
State v. Rosalinda S.
. Because the record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6322 - 2017-09-19
. Because the record contains sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and because this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6322 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the record because they are only words and so I think it is important for me to put that into the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15
the record because they are only words and so I think it is important for me to put that into the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61073 - 2011-03-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on inaccurate information. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133338 - 2017-09-21
on inaccurate information. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133338 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, to refute it on the record, and to file his or her own presentence memorandum containing the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2011-11-21
, to refute it on the record, and to file his or her own presentence memorandum containing the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28
a response. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=744749 - 2023-12-28