Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26041 - 26050 of 57165 for id.
Search results 26041 - 26050 of 57165 for id.
CA Blank Order
intended multiple punishments. Id. at 751. The presumption may be rebutted only by showing clear intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109723 - 2014-04-01
intended multiple punishments. Id. at 751. The presumption may be rebutted only by showing clear intent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109723 - 2014-04-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
subject to a discretionary $250 DNA surcharge rather than a mandatory DNA surcharge of $500. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151802 - 2017-09-21
subject to a discretionary $250 DNA surcharge rather than a mandatory DNA surcharge of $500. See id
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=151802 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Claude A. Gast v. Bonnie Marquardt
innocence by the termination of the criminal proceedings in his favor. Id. cmt. c, at 417. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10949 - 2017-09-19
innocence by the termination of the criminal proceedings in his favor. Id. cmt. c, at 417. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10949 - 2017-09-19
State v. Nathan J. Pettigrew
that the appeal was frivolous and sanctioned the appellant by imposing requirements for filing future appeals. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
that the appeal was frivolous and sanctioned the appellant by imposing requirements for filing future appeals. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20106 - 2007-06-04
[PDF]
Tracy George v. Jon Litscher
or (2) judgments against defendants in their personal capacities. See id. The statute does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15131 - 2017-09-21
or (2) judgments against defendants in their personal capacities. See id. The statute does not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15131 - 2017-09-21
Arvid Ames v. Mark Illick
concludes “but it is doubtful the doctrine of last clear chance was ever the law in Wisconsin.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3236 - 2005-03-31
concludes “but it is doubtful the doctrine of last clear chance was ever the law in Wisconsin.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3236 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
who has already given a DNA sample. See id., 2017 WI App 46, ¶26. Under Williams, Mitchell—who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195137 - 2017-09-21
who has already given a DNA sample. See id., 2017 WI App 46, ¶26. Under Williams, Mitchell—who
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195137 - 2017-09-21
State v. Frank W. Jakubiec
or because, even though it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10739 - 2005-03-31
or because, even though it was then in existence, it was unknowingly overlooked by all of the parties. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10739 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by clear and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Whether a fact or set of facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568308 - 2022-09-20
by clear and convincing evidence that a new factor exists. Id., ¶36. Whether a fact or set of facts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=568308 - 2022-09-20
CA Blank Order
, then there is a presumption that the legislature intended multiple punishments. Id. at 751. The presumption may be rebutted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112084 - 2014-05-13
, then there is a presumption that the legislature intended multiple punishments. Id. at 751. The presumption may be rebutted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112084 - 2014-05-13