Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26061 - 26070 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26061 - 26070 of 29823 for des.
State v. Thermond Larry III
a challenge to a search warrant affidavit under Franks is a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
a challenge to a search warrant affidavit under Franks is a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12992 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a deficiency or amount to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. A. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226511 - 2018-11-06
a deficiency or amount to prejudice are determinations we review de novo. See id. A. Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226511 - 2018-11-06
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8415 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. The trial court that denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8415 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 13
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hamdan, 2003 WI 113, ¶19, 264 Wis. 2d 433, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253382 - 2020-04-27
a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Hamdan, 2003 WI 113, ¶19, 264 Wis. 2d 433, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253382 - 2020-04-27
2009 WI APP 63
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26
2006 WI APP 225
of the Department’s enforcement authority de novo because the decision before us provides no analysis of the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26781 - 2006-11-20
of the Department’s enforcement authority de novo because the decision before us provides no analysis of the issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26781 - 2006-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of law. Id. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36103 - 2009-04-07
of law. Id. This court reviews de novo the legal questions of whether deficient performance has been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36103 - 2009-04-07
State v. Leonard J. LaRoche, Jr.
, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id. at 313-14. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
, despite our de novo standard of review, we value a trial court’s analysis of the issue. Id. at 313-14. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2294 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Erika Eneman v. Pat Richter
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11536 - 2017-09-19
of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v. Hill, 200 Wis.2d 1, 8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11536 - 2017-09-19
Carl E. Merow v. Shinners
. Although summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10715 - 2005-03-31
. Although summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we still value a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10715 - 2005-03-31