Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26061 - 26070 of 57733 for id.
Search results 26061 - 26070 of 57733 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the conduct of governmental business.’” Id. (citation omitted). Leiser’s petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81101 - 2014-09-15
with the conduct of governmental business.’” Id. (citation omitted). Leiser’s petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81101 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
James Earl Jackson v. Sidney Gray
was entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to § 852.01(2m)(br). Id.; see also, Safran v. Safran, 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19
was entitled to an evidentiary hearing pursuant to § 852.01(2m)(br). Id.; see also, Safran v. Safran, 102
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9972 - 2017-09-19
Mark Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.
and ordinary meaning. Id. The analysis ends if the words convey a clear and unambiguous meaning. Id
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19442 - 2005-08-30
and ordinary meaning. Id. The analysis ends if the words convey a clear and unambiguous meaning. Id
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19442 - 2005-08-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Id. at 338-39. Based on its interpretation of a federal statute, the Supreme Court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30240 - 2014-09-15
. Id. at 338-39. Based on its interpretation of a federal statute, the Supreme Court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael W. Carlson
consistent with applicable case law. Id. ¶15 Carlson also argues that the trial court erred by excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3895 - 2017-09-20
consistent with applicable case law. Id. ¶15 Carlson also argues that the trial court erred by excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3895 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
“violated a condition of his … dispositional order” “by a preponderance of the evidence.” See id. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124601 - 2014-10-20
“violated a condition of his … dispositional order” “by a preponderance of the evidence.” See id. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124601 - 2014-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92615 - 2014-09-15
of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Id. at 690
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92615 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Reuben Granado v. Sentry Insurance
to the statute’s plain language. Id. In the absence of statutory definitions, this court construes all words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14941 - 2017-09-21
to the statute’s plain language. Id. In the absence of statutory definitions, this court construes all words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14941 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the commission of a crime, and that they will be found in the place to be searched.’” Id., ¶27 (two sets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893031 - 2024-12-26
with the commission of a crime, and that they will be found in the place to be searched.’” Id., ¶27 (two sets
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893031 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
; and (2) although the DOC did establish allegations 9 through 13, those violations “d[id] not warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
; and (2) although the DOC did establish allegations 9 through 13, those violations “d[id] not warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23