Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26061 - 26070 of 63519 for records/1000.
Search results 26061 - 26070 of 63519 for records/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dismissed.” The only document in the Record related to these previous cases is an order (dated April 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887424 - 2024-12-11
dismissed.” The only document in the Record related to these previous cases is an order (dated April 11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=887424 - 2024-12-11
CA Blank Order
of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116171 - 2014-07-08
of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116171 - 2014-07-08
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
. There is evidence in the record to support this determination. Because the 1982 Cadillac was forfeited, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
. There is evidence in the record to support this determination. Because the 1982 Cadillac was forfeited, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cinda L.
of counsel “if” the parent “requests” appointment of counsel. Id.2 ¶8 The record does not show, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3589 - 2017-09-19
of counsel “if” the parent “requests” appointment of counsel. Id.2 ¶8 The record does not show, nor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3589 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959457 - 2025-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the statutory deadline. Based upon a review of the No. 2023AP373 2 briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858657 - 2024-10-08
the statutory deadline. Based upon a review of the No. 2023AP373 2 briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858657 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143545 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143545 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Scott E. Selmer
and records and falsely certifying that he had done so, and commingling personal and client funds in his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18715 - 2017-09-21
and records and falsely certifying that he had done so, and commingling personal and client funds in his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18715 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and not more than that. After reviewing the record and briefs, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173631 - 2017-09-21
, and not more than that. After reviewing the record and briefs, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173631 - 2017-09-21