Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 39128 for c's.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 39128 for c's.
COURT OF APPEALS
of existing law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c). We award costs and attorney fees only when we deem an appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144457 - 2015-07-15
of existing law.” Wis. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c). We award costs and attorney fees only when we deem an appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144457 - 2015-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, the legislature noted that Wis. Stat. § 948.09 “[c]ombines the provisions in the current fornication and sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36724 - 2009-06-09
, the legislature noted that Wis. Stat. § 948.09 “[c]ombines the provisions in the current fornication and sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36724 - 2009-06-09
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74947 - 2011-12-07
809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74947 - 2011-12-07
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. M.
that the videotaped testimony of his daughters was plainly inadmissible under WIS. STAT. § 908.08(3)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
that the videotaped testimony of his daughters was plainly inadmissible under WIS. STAT. § 908.08(3)(c), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that will be dissipated in whole or in part. b. The individual is unable to provide for his or her support. c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86244 - 2012-08-20
that will be dissipated in whole or in part. b. The individual is unable to provide for his or her support. c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86244 - 2012-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael C. Christofferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88804 - 2012-10-29
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael C. Christofferson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88804 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
Betty Pichelman v. Arnold Barfknecht
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Barron County: JAMES C. EATON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8689 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Barron County: JAMES C. EATON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8689 - 2017-09-19
WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2566 Complete Title o...
: On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Steven C. Kilpatrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100211 - 2013-09-24
: On behalf of the defendants-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of Steven C. Kilpatrick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100211 - 2013-09-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and five years of extended supervision for a Class E felony); 939.62(1)(c) (increasing maximum term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256267 - 2020-03-10
and five years of extended supervision for a Class E felony); 939.62(1)(c) (increasing maximum term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256267 - 2020-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to sell. The will also provided the “[c]losing date shall be no more than forty-five (45) days after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83314 - 2014-09-15
to sell. The will also provided the “[c]losing date shall be no more than forty-five (45) days after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83314 - 2014-09-15