Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 83898 for case number.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 83898 for case number.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at in determining the serious nature of the offense is, number one, there is an aggravating factor here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130755 - 2017-09-21
at in determining the serious nature of the offense is, number one, there is an aggravating factor here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130755 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A.T.
sexual assault charge and was found delinquent. A disposition hearing was then held for both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4635 - 2017-09-19
sexual assault charge and was found delinquent. A disposition hearing was then held for both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4635 - 2017-09-19
State v. Warren A. Goodman
of the defendant’s parole revocation hearing at which a number of key state trial witnesses testified.” He alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
of the defendant’s parole revocation hearing at which a number of key state trial witnesses testified.” He alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of information about the case; explain why he was guilty, explain why he did what he did, offered a lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135949 - 2017-09-21
of information about the case; explain why he was guilty, explain why he did what he did, offered a lot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135949 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
NETTESHEIM, J. In this subrogation case, Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company (Acuity), appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27201 - 2014-09-15
NETTESHEIM, J. In this subrogation case, Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company (Acuity), appeals from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27201 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
constituted a refusal. Because the circumstances presented in this case constitute a refusal, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16299 - 2017-09-21
constituted a refusal. Because the circumstances presented in this case constitute a refusal, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16299 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that additional cross-examination would not have changed the outcome in this case, and we agree. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71564 - 2011-10-03
that additional cross-examination would not have changed the outcome in this case, and we agree. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71564 - 2011-10-03
Linda M. Heath-Miller v. Mark A. Miller
favored Linda’s approach to parenting and gave a number of reasons. ¶4 For example,[1] Linda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5478 - 2005-03-31
favored Linda’s approach to parenting and gave a number of reasons. ¶4 For example,[1] Linda
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allee Boone
to support a motion for a new trial, we look at number two: the party moving for a new trial must not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11317 - 2017-09-19
to support a motion for a new trial, we look at number two: the party moving for a new trial must not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11317 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Richard L. Austin, Sr. v. Nova Services, Inc.
that the pain and suffering award was excessive when compared with awards in other cases where the duration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7766 - 2017-09-19
that the pain and suffering award was excessive when compared with awards in other cases where the duration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7766 - 2017-09-19