Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 29966 for de.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 29966 for de.
[PDF]
State v. Arthur Beiersdorf
. The application of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19
. The application of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., to undisputed facts presents a question of law this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9012 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the statute to the facts of record, presenting a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Penzkofer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32451 - 2014-09-15
the statute to the facts of record, presenting a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Penzkofer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32451 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320556 - 2021-01-05
we review de novo. Rosplock v. Rosplock, 217 Wis. 2d 22, 30, 577 N.W.2d 32 (Ct. App. 1998). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=320556 - 2021-01-05
WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1799 Complete Title o...
the issue de novo.[6] Milwaukee Bd. of Sch. Dirs. v. WERC, 2008 WI App 125, ¶10, 313 Wis. 2d 525, 758 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65357 - 2011-07-25
the issue de novo.[6] Milwaukee Bd. of Sch. Dirs. v. WERC, 2008 WI App 125, ¶10, 313 Wis. 2d 525, 758 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65357 - 2011-07-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology as did the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34782 - 2014-09-15
of a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, applying the same methodology as did the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34782 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28389 - 2014-09-15
, which we decide de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d 628, 634, 369 N.W.2d 711 (1985). When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28389 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213774 - 2018-06-06
. Whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain a verdict is a question of law we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213774 - 2018-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
determine de novo whether the evidence meets the legal criteria for guardianship and protective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=492531 - 2022-03-08
2009 WI APP 63
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-03-30
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-03-30
[PDF]
WI APP 51
of law which we review de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court, but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245058 - 2019-10-04
of law which we review de novo, applying the same methodology as the trial court, but benefiting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245058 - 2019-10-04