Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26071 - 26080 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] Alice J. Heise v. Carl P. Heise
they are clearly erroneous. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2). We review questions of law de novo. See Michael A.P., 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7402 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kenneth M. Herrmann
is an issue of constitutional fact, making our review de novo. See State v. Turner, 136 Wis. 2d 333, 344
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15096 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert E. Lee & Associates, Inc. v. David J. Peters
, 450, 513 N.W.2d 695, 697 (Ct. App. 1994). We review summary judgments de novo. Id. Summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10267 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to counsel is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶21
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80017 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 34
orders present issues of law, which we review de novo and without deference to the interpretations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=538815 - 2022-08-10

[PDF] NOTICE
. The Town’s Summary Judgment Arguments ¶15 We review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34785 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under the statutory scheme de novo.” Schoen, 366 Wis. 2d 279, ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204522 - 2017-12-06

[PDF] State v. Paul Venema
of facts, which presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4386 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. 2 All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231264 - 2018-12-26

Anthony Kish v. Health Personnel Options Corporation
; “[w]hether facts fulfill a particular legal standard is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13001 - 2005-03-31