Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26081 - 26090 of 46941 for shows.
Search results 26081 - 26090 of 46941 for shows.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on an ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim a defendant must show that the issues he believes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245495 - 2019-08-20
on an ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim a defendant must show that the issues he believes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245495 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the record shows that the circuit court engaged in a colloquy with Oswald that satisfied the applicable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132452 - 2017-09-21
, the record shows that the circuit court engaged in a colloquy with Oswald that satisfied the applicable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132452 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Karl
to the state to show by clear and convincing evidence that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12279 - 2017-09-21
to the state to show by clear and convincing evidence that the plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12279 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The record shows the plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. See State v. Bangert, 131
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109282 - 2017-09-21
. The record shows the plea was knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. See State v. Bangert, 131
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109282 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
.2d 106. The opponent must set forth specific evidentiary facts “showing that a genuine issue exists
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104474 - 2013-11-19
.2d 106. The opponent must set forth specific evidentiary facts “showing that a genuine issue exists
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104474 - 2013-11-19
State v. Albert C. Eldridge
on any matter that might actually show bias or self-interest. The trial court properly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14927 - 2005-03-31
on any matter that might actually show bias or self-interest. The trial court properly refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14927 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
from making a claim that could have been raised previously unless [the defendant] shows a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843699 - 2024-08-29
from making a claim that could have been raised previously unless [the defendant] shows a sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=843699 - 2024-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
was “‘unduly harsh or unconscionable,’” or if the movant shows the existence of a new factor that warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
was “‘unduly harsh or unconscionable,’” or if the movant shows the existence of a new factor that warrants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111457 - 2014-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
on a new factor must first show that a new factor exists. State v. Champion, 2002 WI App 267, ¶4, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28069 - 2007-02-12
on a new factor must first show that a new factor exists. State v. Champion, 2002 WI App 267, ¶4, 258 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28069 - 2007-02-12
State v. David W. Hoppe
. § 908.045(4)[2] is not “firmly rooted and therefore there must be a showing of particularized guarantees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02
. § 908.045(4)[2] is not “firmly rooted and therefore there must be a showing of particularized guarantees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7593 - 2005-05-02