Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 84213 for case number.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 84213 for case number.
[PDF]
Reynaldo F. v. Christal M.
2004 WI App 106 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2687
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6954 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 106 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2687
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6954 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rickey Gray
appeals from a judgment and an order for commitment in a ch. 980 case, after a jury found that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3850 - 2017-09-20
appeals from a judgment and an order for commitment in a ch. 980 case, after a jury found that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3850 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy T. Greer
2003 WI App 112 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2591-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4421 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 112 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 01-2591-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4421 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Lewis
2004 WI App 211 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3191-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7085 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 211 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3191-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7085 - 2017-09-20
State v. Steven G. Walters
cannot conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in the present case. A number
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16528 - 2005-03-31
cannot conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion in the present case. A number
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16528 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven G. Walters
its discretion in the present case. A number of the circuit court's conclusions, as pointed out
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16528 - 2017-09-21
its discretion in the present case. A number of the circuit court's conclusions, as pointed out
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16528 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is appropriate in this case because: (1) the plea colloquy was defective under State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44720 - 2014-09-15
is appropriate in this case because: (1) the plea colloquy was defective under State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44720 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case because: (1) the plea colloquy was defective under State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44720 - 2009-12-16
in this case because: (1) the plea colloquy was defective under State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 389 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44720 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
WI 34
, and thus found Stetzer guilty of operating a motor vehicle with a PAC. ΒΆ4 This case presents two legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979155 - 2025-07-03
, and thus found Stetzer guilty of operating a motor vehicle with a PAC. ΒΆ4 This case presents two legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=979155 - 2025-07-03
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - May
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES May 2005 This calendar contains
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17909 - 2017-09-21
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES May 2005 This calendar contains
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17909 - 2017-09-21