Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 34728 for in n.

COURT OF APPEALS
or rule that would have allowed him to act as a peace officer in Grant County. Id. at 179 n.3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88622 - 2012-10-24

COURT OF APPEALS
, 2009 WI 6, ¶49 n.20, 315 Wis. 2d 253, 759 N.W.2d 557. Consequently, the State was not required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62848 - 2011-04-13

COURT OF APPEALS
analysis. See State v. Kutz, 2003 WI App 205, ¶17 n.4, 267 Wis. 2d 531, 671 N.W.2d 660 (“Nothing in [State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33177 - 2008-06-25

COURT OF APPEALS
bases his or her opinion that another witness is untruthful. State v. Spraggin, 77 Wis. 2d 89, 102 n.12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35696 - 2009-03-02

Certification
); People v. Zamora, 557 P.2d 75, 93 n.27 (Cal. 1976) (burden is on the prosecutor by a preponderance
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30956 - 2007-11-20

COURT OF APPEALS
will support an [argument].” Tam v. Luk, 154 Wis. 2d 282, 291 n.5, 453 N.W.2d 158 (Ct. App. 1990) (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53590 - 2010-08-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
away from his children” and that “[n]either parent made themselves available for services
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701221 - 2023-09-12

State v. Kovac Kidd
to determine whether to instruct on a lesser offense. State v. Carrington, 134 Wis. 2d 260, 262 n.1, 397 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7044 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
administrators for her estate. Id., ¶6 n.2. A jury ultimately found that the transfers to Richard were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186295 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
postconviction relief. Id. at 115 n.12, 13. Jasin’s claims are time-barred under Pennsylvania law. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30962 - 2014-09-15