Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 63559 for records.
Search results 26091 - 26100 of 63559 for records.
Frontsheet
the plaintiff's counsel and the court remarked they had not received the affidavit. Electronic court records did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115776 - 2014-06-30
the plaintiff's counsel and the court remarked they had not received the affidavit. Electronic court records did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115776 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
denied Rogstad’s motion to dismiss for reasons stated on the record.[3] The court determined after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
denied Rogstad’s motion to dismiss for reasons stated on the record.[3] The court determined after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
Patricia Hebert v. Thomas J. Hebert
factual findings on facts appearing in the record and that the decision was an unreasonable exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13091 - 2005-03-31
factual findings on facts appearing in the record and that the decision was an unreasonable exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13091 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16
review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95390 - 2013-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
in sentencing based on gender and further emphasized multiple factors, which had been stated on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01
in sentencing based on gender and further emphasized multiple factors, which had been stated on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Confucius Gooden
believe that given the lack of substantial prior record, and the facts of this case, that five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
believe that given the lack of substantial prior record, and the facts of this case, that five years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11869 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209858 - 2018-03-13
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209858 - 2018-03-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addressing those claims. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104668 - 2017-09-21
addressing those claims. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit reports
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Allen Hopkins
substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19
substantial reason not to do so and states the reason on the record. Restitution ordered under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7785 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the record and misconstrued the administrative code. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Beaton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51803 - 2014-09-15
the record and misconstrued the administrative code. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Beaton’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51803 - 2014-09-15