Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 15277 for 2013.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 15277 for 2013.
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140995 - 2015-05-05
a no-merit report pursuant to Wis. Stat. Rule 809.32 (2013-14)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140995 - 2015-05-05
COURT OF APPEALS
be different at a new hearing. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January 3, 2013, Urban was issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107948 - 2014-02-10
be different at a new hearing. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On January 3, 2013, Urban was issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107948 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine, or both. See WIS. STAT. §§ 946.49(1)(b) and 939.50(3)(h) (2013-14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175039 - 2017-09-21
of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine, or both. See WIS. STAT. §§ 946.49(1)(b) and 939.50(3)(h) (2013-14
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175039 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 752.31(2)(d) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135538 - 2015-02-24
. § 752.31(2)(d) (2013-14). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135538 - 2015-02-24
CA Blank Order
Hanko’s petition for discharge from commitment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2013-14).[1] Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146728 - 2015-08-17
Hanko’s petition for discharge from commitment under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2013-14).[1] Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146728 - 2015-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
dangerous to others. We disagree and affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November 2013, three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123655 - 2017-09-21
dangerous to others. We disagree and affirm the circuit court. BACKGROUND ¶2 In November 2013, three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123655 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as February 1, 2013. ¶3 On February 20, 2013, Rehdantz moved to prohibit the State from introducing any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113865 - 2017-09-21
as February 1, 2013. ¶3 On February 20, 2013, Rehdantz moved to prohibit the State from introducing any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113865 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); and State ex rel. McCoy v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174439 - 2017-09-21
. RULE 809.32 (2013-14); 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); and State ex rel. McCoy v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142521 - 2017-09-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142521 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
), No. 2012AP1955, unpublished op. and order (WI App Jun. 12, 2013). In that decision, we noted that Hessil did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117960 - 2014-07-29
), No. 2012AP1955, unpublished op. and order (WI App Jun. 12, 2013). In that decision, we noted that Hessil did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117960 - 2014-07-29