Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 3970 for davie.
Thor C. Mikula v. Miller Brewing Company
-party plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jeffrey O. Davis and Patrick S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17652 - 2005-05-24
-party plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Jeffrey O. Davis and Patrick S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17652 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
WI APP 89
to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006); Crawford v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84628 - 2014-09-15
to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006); Crawford v. Washington
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84628 - 2014-09-15
WI APP 89 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2363-CR 2010AP2364-CR ...
] The confrontation right applies to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84628 - 2012-08-28
] The confrontation right applies to statements that are “testimonial.” Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 821 (2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84628 - 2012-08-28
[PDF]
WI APP 182
of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Green Bay. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the intervening defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42965 - 2014-09-15
of Davis & Kuelthau, S.C., Green Bay. Respondent ATTORNEYS: On behalf of the intervening defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42965 - 2014-09-15
State v. James L. Holloway
to the defendant. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8316 - 2005-03-31
to the defendant. State v. Davis, 144 Wis.2d 852, 855, 425 N.W.2d 411, 412 (1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8316 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86080 - 2014-09-15
, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86080 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (quoting State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 781-82, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992)); see also State v. Davis, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
) (quoting State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 781-82, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992)); see also State v. Davis, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Id., ¶18 (quoting Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006)). Statements are “‘testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
.’” Id., ¶18 (quoting Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006)). Statements are “‘testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are proper factors for consideration. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶13, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25
are proper factors for consideration. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶13, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2016); see also State v. Davis, 2011 WI App 74, ¶¶9-10, 333 Wis. 2d 490, 798 N.W.2d 902. They can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244116 - 2019-07-23
. 2016); see also State v. Davis, 2011 WI App 74, ¶¶9-10, 333 Wis. 2d 490, 798 N.W.2d 902. They can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244116 - 2019-07-23