Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo but give appropriate deference.” Patrick Cudahy Inc. v. LIRC, 2006 WI App 211, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86918 - 2014-09-15
review de novo but give appropriate deference.” Patrick Cudahy Inc. v. LIRC, 2006 WI App 211, ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86918 - 2014-09-15
May a judge or the judge's staff attend a holiday party given by a law firm some of whose members appear before the judge?
Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=887 - 2005-03-31
Yes, if of a de minimis nature
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=887 - 2005-03-31
Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v. Village of Hartland
judgment, we apply de novo the standards set forth in Wis. Stat. § 802.08. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4860 - 2005-03-31
judgment, we apply de novo the standards set forth in Wis. Stat. § 802.08. Voss v. City of Middleton, 162
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
charges associated with the time and materials needed to complete the project. La Velle v. De Luca, 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564120 - 2022-09-09
charges associated with the time and materials needed to complete the project. La Velle v. De Luca, 48
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564120 - 2022-09-09
American Standard Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
—is hotly contested by the parties. American Family, as expected, urges us to consider the issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12361 - 2005-03-31
—is hotly contested by the parties. American Family, as expected, urges us to consider the issues de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12361 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Sandra K. Murray v. Patrick R. Murray
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See id. But because this legal determination is intertwined with the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15563 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Additional facts are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
. Additional facts are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: Linda M. Van De Water, Judge. Judgment affirmed; order reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57780 - 2010-12-14
Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App No. 2019AP866 6 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307053 - 2020-11-24
that we review de novo.” State ex rel. Washington v. State, 2012 WI App No. 2019AP866 6 74
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307053 - 2020-11-24