Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 29713 for des.
Jay W. Smith v. Paul Katz
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as that employed by the circuit court. See Shannon v. Shannon
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17135 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael J. Schultz v. Village of Stoddard
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24564 - 2017-09-21
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24564 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276. ¶10 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7277 - 2017-09-20
review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276. ¶10 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7277 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
) is a matter of statutory construction subject to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
) is a matter of statutory construction subject to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19987 - 2017-09-21
City of Milwaukee v. Michael A. Bell
while intoxicated. Bell then petitioned the circuit court for a de novo review of the charge for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
while intoxicated. Bell then petitioned the circuit court for a de novo review of the charge for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16040 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Milwaukee County Safety Building Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Dayone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531967 - 2022-06-14
Milwaukee County Safety Building Electronic Notice Marcella De Peters Electronic Notice Dayone
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=531967 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Randolph Scott
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See id. However, if the defendant fails to allege sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13488 - 2017-09-21
Jack Gasparac v. Mae Schunk
We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4869 - 2005-03-31
We review the grant or denial of a summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4869 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo.” State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29
review de novo.” State v. Stewart, 2018 WI App 41, ¶18, 383 Wis. 2d 546, 916 N.W.2d 188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380690 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
Deborah A. (Mumaw) Carpenter v. Thomas L. Mumaw
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14891 - 2017-09-21
moved for a hearing de novo before the circuit court on Mumaw’s motion. See § 767.13(6), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14891 - 2017-09-21