Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 2611 - 2620 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“to test one or more samples of your breath, blood or urine.” After reading the form for himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179913 - 2017-09-21
“to test one or more samples of your breath, blood or urine.” After reading the form for himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179913 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the influence of some type of drug and therefore administered field sobriety tests. Krukowski showed no clues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863769 - 2024-10-23
the influence of some type of drug and therefore administered field sobriety tests. Krukowski showed no clues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863769 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to introduce evidence of drug test results, to show that Deloney never had a “dirty” urinalysis. The hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318162 - 2020-12-23
to introduce evidence of drug test results, to show that Deloney never had a “dirty” urinalysis. The hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318162 - 2020-12-23
[PDF]
State v. John E.
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARTIN J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15853 - 2017-09-21
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARTIN J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15853 - 2017-09-21
State v. John E.
. Before continuing, the trial court ordered that John and Latrina undergo DNA testing to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15853 - 2005-03-31
. Before continuing, the trial court ordered that John and Latrina undergo DNA testing to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15853 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not apply because Liggins’ blood sample had previously been tested, and therefore postconviction testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
not apply because Liggins’ blood sample had previously been tested, and therefore postconviction testing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not apply because Liggins’ blood sample had previously been tested, and therefore postconviction testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
not apply because Liggins’ blood sample had previously been tested, and therefore postconviction testing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995609 - 2025-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
tests were ordered by the court and the result of that test excluded [Norwood] as the father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231772 - 2019-01-08
tests were ordered by the court and the result of that test excluded [Norwood] as the father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231772 - 2019-01-08
State v. Michael J. Arpke
from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: GARY LANGHOFF, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3625 - 2005-03-31
from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: GARY LANGHOFF, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Arpke
from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: GARY LANGHOFF, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19
from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: GARY LANGHOFF, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3625 - 2017-09-19