Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26111 - 26120 of 44658 for part.
Search results 26111 - 26120 of 44658 for part.
COURT OF APPEALS
in the fact that a person matching several reasonably specific parts of that description was at the mall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34795 - 2008-12-03
in the fact that a person matching several reasonably specific parts of that description was at the mall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34795 - 2008-12-03
State v. Michael J. Arpke
). See § 343.305(9)(a). Section 343.305(10)(a) states in relevant part: If the court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2579 - 2005-03-31
). See § 343.305(9)(a). Section 343.305(10)(a) states in relevant part: If the court determines
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2579 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
witnesses or exhibits at trial. The circuit court granted the motion in part, and at the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858979 - 2024-10-08
witnesses or exhibits at trial. The circuit court granted the motion in part, and at the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=858979 - 2024-10-08
State v. Brian M. Czarnecki
held that these touchings were part of the same general transaction, occurred in the space of a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14255 - 2005-03-31
held that these touchings were part of the same general transaction, occurred in the space of a few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14255 - 2005-03-31
City of Stevens Point v. John Pliska
-1372, 87FM-1373 & 88FM-27” in the amount of $8,631. It also provided, in relevant part: 4. DEFAULT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16304 - 2005-03-31
-1372, 87FM-1373 & 88FM-27” in the amount of $8,631. It also provided, in relevant part: 4. DEFAULT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16304 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Alger
. The first part informed the jury that the prosecution need not prove the precise date of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15359 - 2005-03-31
. The first part informed the jury that the prosecution need not prove the precise date of the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15359 - 2005-03-31
Linda LaBerge v. Arthur LaBerge
that the trial court applied this standard in reaching its conclusion. The trial court stated in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9851 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court applied this standard in reaching its conclusion. The trial court stated in pertinent part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9851 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Thompson
and order affirmed. [1] Section 973.09(1)(a), Stats., provides in pertinent part: “[I]f a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
and order affirmed. [1] Section 973.09(1)(a), Stats., provides in pertinent part: “[I]f a person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10238 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
spouses must fully disclose “all assets owned in full or in part by either party separately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08
spouses must fully disclose “all assets owned in full or in part by either party separately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73299 - 2011-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, Willison was convicted of first-degree murder and armed robbery, both as a party to a crime. As part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
, Willison was convicted of first-degree murder and armed robbery, both as a party to a crime. As part
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15