Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26111 - 26120 of 63537 for records.
Search results 26111 - 26120 of 63537 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
: Can I? THE COURT: Sure. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
: Can I? THE COURT: Sure. (The defendant conferring with attorney off the record.) THE DEFENDANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73674 - 2011-11-14
City of Madison v. Jens W.L. Hinrichsen
this issue before the trial court, and we see no evidence in the record that he did. In order to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11375 - 2005-03-31
this issue before the trial court, and we see no evidence in the record that he did. In order to challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11375 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry Saenz v. Gary McCaughtry
committee’s decision. We agree but conclude that there was substantial evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
committee’s decision. We agree but conclude that there was substantial evidence in the record to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13416 - 2017-09-21
State v. David Borst
] Because the record thus supports a determination that Borst understood his rights and that Artus would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
] Because the record thus supports a determination that Borst understood his rights and that Artus would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19310 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980324 - 2025-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the contract. Further, the record shows that there was credible evidence to support the jury’s answers to all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64767 - 2011-05-24
the contract. Further, the record shows that there was credible evidence to support the jury’s answers to all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64767 - 2011-05-24
State v. Patricia Marie F-K.
where the record shows “that the trial court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31
where the record shows “that the trial court examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31
State v. Raul M. Cordova
day of the hearing, a tape recording was made of McClory translating the consent to search form from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
day of the hearing, a tape recording was made of McClory translating the consent to search form from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michelle M.
evidence in the record to support the termination, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 Paulette G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18236 - 2017-09-21
evidence in the record to support the termination, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 Paulette G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18236 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
electronically recorded phone calls. This part of the motion was not decided in the circuit court’s initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15
electronically recorded phone calls. This part of the motion was not decided in the circuit court’s initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121168 - 2014-09-15