Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26111 - 26120 of 65039 for timed.
Search results 26111 - 26120 of 65039 for timed.
CA Blank Order
the respondent a copy or summary of the petition and notice of the time for hearing on the issuance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133743 - 2015-01-27
the respondent a copy or summary of the petition and notice of the time for hearing on the issuance
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133743 - 2015-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the agreed upon recommendation. Brown asked for jail time. The sentencing court was concerned that Brown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139103 - 2017-09-21
the agreed upon recommendation. Brown asked for jail time. The sentencing court was concerned that Brown
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. La'Shone Jackson
that he did not timely provide information about the additional witnesses to his second attorney. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2941 - 2017-09-19
that he did not timely provide information about the additional witnesses to his second attorney. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2941 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
sentence, with the remaining time of that confinement portion then converted to extended supervision time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017155 - 2025-10-01
sentence, with the remaining time of that confinement portion then converted to extended supervision time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017155 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
within ninety days of sentencing. Johnson’s motion was filed well beyond that time frame. The second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61904 - 2014-09-15
within ninety days of sentencing. Johnson’s motion was filed well beyond that time frame. The second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Phillip G. Robinson
this argument at the circuit court.3 We do not consider arguments raised for the first time before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10307 - 2017-09-20
this argument at the circuit court.3 We do not consider arguments raised for the first time before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10307 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Frank W. Jakubiec
at the time of the original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence or because, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10739 - 2017-09-20
at the time of the original sentencing, either because it was not then in existence or because, even though
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10739 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
was not exhibiting the same signs of mental confusion when he pled as he exhibited to counsel at other times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18
was not exhibiting the same signs of mental confusion when he pled as he exhibited to counsel at other times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29758 - 2007-07-18
CA Blank Order
and now.” The court also emphasized Lacy was on supervision at the time of the current offenses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139535 - 2010-08-02
and now.” The court also emphasized Lacy was on supervision at the time of the current offenses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139535 - 2010-08-02
Office of State Public Defender v. Circuit Court For Walworth County
was ambiguous as it read at the time of the circuit court’s order, and we acknowledge that that was the version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15795 - 2005-03-31
was ambiguous as it read at the time of the circuit court’s order, and we acknowledge that that was the version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15795 - 2005-03-31