Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 65155 for or b.
Harrison D. Kern v. Board of Fire and Police Commissioners for the City of Milwaukee
that Kern failed to preserve this issue. B. Equal Protection. Kern next claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12280 - 2006-11-20
that Kern failed to preserve this issue. B. Equal Protection. Kern next claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12280 - 2006-11-20
State v. Anthony Murray
from a judgment convicting him of three counts of armed robbery contrary to § 943.32(1)(b) & (2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment convicting him of three counts of armed robbery contrary to § 943.32(1)(b) & (2), Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
for a writ of habeas corpus.”) (emphasis in Starks). B. Ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
for a writ of habeas corpus.”) (emphasis in Starks). B. Ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108849 - 2014-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
up, and (b) the court neglected to consider equitable principles. We reject both arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2012-12-18
up, and (b) the court neglected to consider equitable principles. We reject both arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2012-12-18
City of Superior v. Hunter Hill
of a Class B misdemeanor.” The maximum penalty for violating § 23-4(a) is a forfeiture of $188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2013-07-09
of a Class B misdemeanor.” The maximum penalty for violating § 23-4(a) is a forfeiture of $188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2013-07-09
State v. Ralph J. Smith
police officer to suspect that Smith was armed and dangerous. B. Smith’s Confession ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16287 - 2013-02-11
police officer to suspect that Smith was armed and dangerous. B. Smith’s Confession ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16287 - 2013-02-11
State v. Brian J. Coerper
. ROLAND B. DAY, C.J. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals, State v. Coerper, 192 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16955 - 2005-08-31
. ROLAND B. DAY, C.J. This is a review of a decision of the court of appeals, State v. Coerper, 192 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16955 - 2005-08-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 943.20(1)(b). ¶3 At trial, Peterson’s defense was that Fetvedt authorized her to spend or withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52587 - 2010-07-26
. § 943.20(1)(b). ¶3 At trial, Peterson’s defense was that Fetvedt authorized her to spend or withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52587 - 2010-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
will not be published. Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32993 - 2008-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the children featured in such depictions have been horribly victimized. The prosecutor argued that “[b]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2005-04-13
and that the children featured in such depictions have been horribly victimized. The prosecutor argued that “[b]y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100778 - 2005-04-13