Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 65155 for or b.
Bernard R. Lyon v. Renee G. Hilgers
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16263 - 2005-03-31
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 1997-98 version unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16263 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. Stat. §§ 940.32(2), 939.50(3)(i), and 973.01(2)(b)9. The trial court accepted Lavender’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-07-22
Wis. Stat. §§ 940.32(2), 939.50(3)(i), and 973.01(2)(b)9. The trial court accepted Lavender’s plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98285 - 2013-07-22
KHLH, Inc v. Wisconsin Land Surveyors, Ltd.
correctly determined that the surveyor owed a duty of care to the contractors.[2] B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15384 - 2005-03-31
correctly determined that the surveyor owed a duty of care to the contractors.[2] B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15384 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lennis B. Reynolds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139720 - 2015-04-14
State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lennis B. Reynolds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139720 - 2015-04-14
Ruth M. Bendimez v. Allen M. Neidermire and Cecelia E. Neidermire
, †Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Allen M. Neidermire and Cecelia E. Neidermire, d/b/a Old Mill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13710 - 2005-03-31
, †Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Allen M. Neidermire and Cecelia E. Neidermire, d/b/a Old Mill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13710 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of these crimes. There is no basis under Bangert to justify an evidentiary hearing regarding plea withdrawal. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
of these crimes. There is no basis under Bangert to justify an evidentiary hearing regarding plea withdrawal. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
for a number of offenses, the court rejected that argument “[b]ecause the State failed to show that an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2008-10-01
for a number of offenses, the court rejected that argument “[b]ecause the State failed to show that an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34197 - 2008-10-01
Janet M. Evans v. Timothy D. Heitman, M.D.
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Throughout this opinion, Timothy D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14112 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Throughout this opinion, Timothy D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14112 - 2005-03-31
City of Superior v. Hunter Hill
of a Class B misdemeanor.” The maximum penalty for violating § 23-4(a) is a forfeiture of $188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2005-03-31
of a Class B misdemeanor.” The maximum penalty for violating § 23-4(a) is a forfeiture of $188. ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5185 - 2005-03-31
Babette Grunow v. The UWM Post
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] In her amended complaint, Grunow alleges that “[t]he defendant, The UWM Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-05-02
809.23(1)(b)5. [1] In her amended complaint, Grunow alleges that “[t]he defendant, The UWM Post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15231 - 2005-05-02