Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 65178 for or b.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 65178 for or b.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Bangert to justify an evidentiary hearing regarding plea withdrawal. B. Nelson/Bentley ¶12 We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
Bangert to justify an evidentiary hearing regarding plea withdrawal. B. Nelson/Bentley ¶12 We now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74805 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 785.01(1)(a) and (b). Rynders argues the circuit court erred in: (1) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126143 - 2017-09-21
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 785.01(1)(a) and (b). Rynders argues the circuit court erred in: (1) failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126143 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Lawrence Williams
and that the statements he gave were voluntary. B. Dismissal of the thirteenth juror. The selection of jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
and that the statements he gave were voluntary. B. Dismissal of the thirteenth juror. The selection of jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12432 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Juneau County v. Sauk County
to an undisputed set of facts. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205 Wis.2d 510, 515, 557 N.W.2d 84, 86 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
to an undisputed set of facts. Amber J.F. v. Richard B., 205 Wis.2d 510, 515, 557 N.W.2d 84, 86 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4)(b). Second, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
. See WIS. STAT. § 971.14(4)(b). Second, the circuit court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778472 - 2024-03-26
COURT OF APPEALS
up, and (b) the court neglected to consider equitable principles. We reject both arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14
up, and (b) the court neglected to consider equitable principles. We reject both arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51059 - 2010-06-14
State v. David L. Kons
party consent tapes were admissible under § 968.29(3)(b), Stats. During trial, Kons objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7960 - 2005-03-31
party consent tapes were admissible under § 968.29(3)(b), Stats. During trial, Kons objected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7960 - 2005-03-31
State v. Frankie Groenke
the issue. We therefore deem this issue waived. B. Newly Discovered Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
the issue. We therefore deem this issue waived. B. Newly Discovered Evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11724 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This opinion shall not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] “No person other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07
. This opinion shall not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] “No person other than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54126 - 2010-09-07
COURT OF APPEALS
concentration (PAC) of .10 or more, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (2007-08), first offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44707 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC) of .10 or more, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) and (b) (2007-08), first offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44707 - 2005-03-31