Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 58547 for speedy trial.
Search results 26121 - 26130 of 58547 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the jury found that MSA was not negligent and did not breach its contract with Renschler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97145 - 2014-09-15
trial, the jury found that MSA was not negligent and did not breach its contract with Renschler
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97145 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, following a jury trial, of two counts of repeated sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137797 - 2015-03-16
, following a jury trial, of two counts of repeated sexual assault of a child, contrary to Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137797 - 2015-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective and the reasons Attorney Holzman has concluded that Gilmore’s concerns
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181480 - 2017-09-21
trial counsel was ineffective and the reasons Attorney Holzman has concluded that Gilmore’s concerns
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181480 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of contract. After a seven-day trial, the jury found that MSA was not negligent and did not breach its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97145 - 2013-05-22
of contract. After a seven-day trial, the jury found that MSA was not negligent and did not breach its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97145 - 2013-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
a jury trial, awarding the respondent, Legacy DC, Inc., damages, costs, and fees of $547,865.45. In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52418 - 2010-07-27
a jury trial, awarding the respondent, Legacy DC, Inc., damages, costs, and fees of $547,865.45. In its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52418 - 2010-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for postconviction relief, arguing that he was entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987742 - 2025-07-24
moved for postconviction relief, arguing that he was entitled to a new trial because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987742 - 2025-07-24
Trinidad M. Alvarez v. Jack Flannery
, it was harmless; and that a new trial in the interests of justice is not warranted. However, we reverse the award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3963 - 2005-03-31
, it was harmless; and that a new trial in the interests of justice is not warranted. However, we reverse the award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3963 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of two counts of repeated sexual assault
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137797 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of two counts of repeated sexual assault
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137797 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the meeting, stating that the entire meeting was in closed session. The trial court found that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80711 - 2012-04-10
the meeting, stating that the entire meeting was in closed session. The trial court found that both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80711 - 2012-04-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The trial court found that both the letter and the e-mail were inadmissible hearsay evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80711 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court found that both the letter and the e-mail were inadmissible hearsay evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80711 - 2014-09-15