Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 29722 for des.

State v. Johnnie Carprue
is de novo. State v. Littrup, 164 Wis. 2d 120, 473 N.W.2d 164 (Ct. App. 1991). We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5787 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Banc One Building Management Corporation v. W.R. Grace Co.--Conn.
are purely economic damages, and that any other property damages are de minimis or coincidental
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9987 - 2017-09-19

Walworth County v. Therese B.
protective placement are questions of law, which we review de novo. At a hearing on a petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6363 - 2005-03-31

Amy L. Walker v. University of Wisconsin Hospitals
de novo whether the therapist's duty in re-tying the restraints was so "`absolute, certain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8433 - 2005-03-31

Theresa Dittberner v. Windsor Sanitary District Number 1
the same methodology as the trial court and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10607 - 2005-03-31

State v. Donald L. Long
, the deficiency was prejudicial are questions of law, which we decide de novo. Pitch, 124 Wis.2d at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7736 - 2005-03-31

State v. Yen Yang
on the brief of David J. Matyas, of De Pere. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 8, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15505 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
placement is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶21 To order that an individual continue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980091 - 2025-07-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
232, 634 N.W.2d 109. “We review the legal issues de novo. However, the circuit court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768307 - 2024-02-27

Thomas W. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane County
questions of law de novo, without giving deference to the decisions of the lower courts. See Jungbluth 201
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17143 - 2005-03-31