Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 46099 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 46099 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
at 353 (quoting Miranda, 384 U.S. at 477 (ellipses added)). The test is whether a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104296 - 2017-09-21
at 353 (quoting Miranda, 384 U.S. at 477 (ellipses added)). The test is whether a reasonable person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104296 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy M. F.
conclude that it was harmless. The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7264 - 2017-09-20
conclude that it was harmless. The test for harmless error is whether there is a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7264 - 2017-09-20
2010 WI APP 134
significant way.” Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444. The test for custody is objective. The court asks whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
significant way.” Miranda, 384 U.S. at 444. The test for custody is objective. The court asks whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53555 - 2010-09-28
State v. Nakia N. Hayes
of the search warrant. This obviously is true. But it does not necessarily invalidate the warrant. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8280 - 2005-03-31
of the search warrant. This obviously is true. But it does not necessarily invalidate the warrant. The test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8280 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Marks
with prejudice under the test set forth in State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
with prejudice under the test set forth in State v. Davis, 2001 WI 136, 248 Wis. 2d 986, 637 N.W.2d 62. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6725 - 2005-03-31
State v. William H. Roberts
and glassy. Roberts did not cooperate and refused to take any chemical test to determine if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
and glassy. Roberts did not cooperate and refused to take any chemical test to determine if he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4089 - 2005-03-31
State v. Virtis A.
” in the preceding two years, and that he tested positive for opiates and cocaine even after the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31
” in the preceding two years, and that he tested positive for opiates and cocaine even after the petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6666 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Kearney
, and that the tests he performed on Kearney revealed no evidence that Kearney suffered from any sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15010 - 2017-09-21
, and that the tests he performed on Kearney revealed no evidence that Kearney suffered from any sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15010 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey P. Williamson
test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2732 - 2017-09-19
test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2732 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tony B. Oliver
for the prejudice prong of the test is whether the alleged deficiency so undermined the proper functioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5290 - 2017-09-19
for the prejudice prong of the test is whether the alleged deficiency so undermined the proper functioning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5290 - 2017-09-19