Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 58253 for speedy trial.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 58253 for speedy trial.
State v. Henry Bowles
. § 943.20(1)(b) (1997-98).[1] He asserts that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14877 - 2005-03-31
. § 943.20(1)(b) (1997-98).[1] He asserts that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14877 - 2005-03-31
State v. Samuel H. Warp
, contrary to §§ 948.02(1) and 939.62, Stats.; and (2) the trial court rejected his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14337 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to §§ 948.02(1) and 939.62, Stats.; and (2) the trial court rejected his claim that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14337 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tina H.
a diligent effort to provide her with parenting services. Tina also argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13017 - 2017-09-21
a diligent effort to provide her with parenting services. Tina also argues that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court jurisdiction.2 Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27053 - 2014-09-15
court jurisdiction.2 Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion to find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27053 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Theodore Frostman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that it is entitled to a new trial due to improper jury instructions, erroneous admission of evidence regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8247 - 2017-09-19
that it is entitled to a new trial due to improper jury instructions, erroneous admission of evidence regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8247 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶2 The following rendition of the incident is from the trial testimony of Michael Buckett, one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34359 - 2014-09-15
. ¶2 The following rendition of the incident is from the trial testimony of Michael Buckett, one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34359 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald Roy Peterson
] plea. Peterson claims that the trial court wrongly denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8876 - 2005-03-31
] plea. Peterson claims that the trial court wrongly denied his motion to suppress the evidence seized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the State to file a response; (2) whether Lewis’s trial counsel was ineffective in jury selection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38453 - 2014-09-15
the State to file a response; (2) whether Lewis’s trial counsel was ineffective in jury selection
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=38453 - 2014-09-15
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Rochelle D.
, Rochelle appeared with her attorney and requested a jury trial. ¶4 On August 7, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3702 - 2005-03-31
, Rochelle appeared with her attorney and requested a jury trial. ¶4 On August 7, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3702 - 2005-03-31
Wesley Rathburn v. Dallas
represented to have belonged to WTTI in the security agreement. ¶4 On the day of trial, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5304 - 2005-03-31
represented to have belonged to WTTI in the security agreement. ¶4 On the day of trial, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5304 - 2005-03-31