Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26131 - 26140 of 58492 for speedy trial.

State v. Lyle A. Greendeer
is whether Greendeer is entitled to a new trial on the grounds that jurors received prejudicial, extraneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10293 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jane I. Peckham
that attains the same goal without violating Peckham's constitutional rights. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9325 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Corey W. Schulte
claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3719 - 2017-09-19

State v. David J. Pettit
is whether the State’s initial petition gave the trial court competency to proceed with the matter. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4596 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Raymond Sykes, Jr.
. The trial court accepted the plea and sentenced Sykes to eleven-and nine-year concurrent terms on the armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9055 - 2017-09-19

State v. Feliciano T. Douglas
to a new trial because extraneous information was introduced into jury deliberations. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5998 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David C. Haubrich
claims that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to suppress evidence.1 We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2198 - 2017-09-19

General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Cameron Gilbert
for summary judgment. The law firm raises two issues on appeal. It claims that: (1) the trial court had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9022 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jack Schilling
appeals from his jury-trial conviction of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13284 - 2017-09-21

Tracy George v. Jon Litscher
and Deininger, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tracy George appeals from a trial court order that denied him $188.98 in costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15131 - 2005-03-31