Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26141 - 26150 of 39128 for c's.
Search results 26141 - 26150 of 39128 for c's.
COURT OF APPEALS
the State cited Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3), it failed to comply with Rule 809.23(3)(c), which requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77607 - 2012-02-06
the State cited Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(3), it failed to comply with Rule 809.23(3)(c), which requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77607 - 2012-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 11, 2010 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appea...
because this [c]ourt would clearly need to award [Gerald] maintenance.” It likewise concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49923 - 2010-05-10
because this [c]ourt would clearly need to award [Gerald] maintenance.” It likewise concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49923 - 2010-05-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
is designated as a through arterial street … except as provided in subsections A, B, and C of this section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34436 - 2014-09-15
is designated as a through arterial street … except as provided in subsections A, B, and C of this section
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34436 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, V. WILLIAM C. KOTLOW AND JUDITH A. KOTLOW, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21
, V. WILLIAM C. KOTLOW AND JUDITH A. KOTLOW, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191675 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in noncompliance with Town Ordinance No. 13-2-5(c). The court imposed a fine of either $2500 or thirty days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31212 - 2007-12-18
in noncompliance with Town Ordinance No. 13-2-5(c). The court imposed a fine of either $2500 or thirty days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31212 - 2007-12-18
Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Tonya B.
charge. C. Comply with a visitation schedule established by the [Department]. The court signed an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31
charge. C. Comply with a visitation schedule established by the [Department]. The court signed an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31
State v. Torrence D. Goss
from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: DENNIS C. LUEBKE, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3058 - 2005-03-31
from judgments and orders of the circuit court for Outagamie County: DENNIS C. LUEBKE, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3058 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: SUZANNE C. O’NEILL, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928900 - 2025-03-18
from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: SUZANNE C. O’NEILL, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928900 - 2025-03-18
State v. Gary L. Radloff
for Waukesha County: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY and Paul Reilly, Judges. Judgment modified and, as modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7429 - 2005-03-31
for Waukesha County: PATRICK C. HAUGHNEY and Paul Reilly, Judges. Judgment modified and, as modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7429 - 2005-03-31
State v. Brian K. Rice
. Section 973.09(1)(a) provides: Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
. Section 973.09(1)(a) provides: Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31