Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26141 - 26150 of 29823 for des.
Search results 26141 - 26150 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 26, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Barritt v. Lowe, 2003 WI App 185, ¶6, 266 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25
interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. Barritt v. Lowe, 2003 WI App 185, ¶6, 266 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135632 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156714 - 2017-09-21
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156714 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156717 - 2017-09-21
the criteria for reinstatement, on a de novo basis. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Jennings, 2011 WI
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156717 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Carol Peterson v. Marquette University
reviews de novo a district court's grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict and applies the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8024 - 2017-09-19
reviews de novo a district court's grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict and applies the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Roehl Transport, Inc. v. Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
the division’s decision. Roehl renews its arguments on appeal. But our de novo review of the division’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11995 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11916 - 2017-09-21
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Further, we will sustain a discretionary act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11916 - 2017-09-21
Jerry Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians
is a question of law, also subject to a de novo standard of review. See id. While we appreciate and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14869 - 2006-09-30
is a question of law, also subject to a de novo standard of review. See id. While we appreciate and consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14869 - 2006-09-30
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20923 - 2009-02-11
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20923 - 2009-02-11
2009 WI APP 63
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26
questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See Ziervogel, 269 Wis. 2d 549, ¶14. ¶14 Driehaus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36034 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). No. 2023AP2377-CR 9 ¶18 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25
Wis. 2d 280, 288, 234 N.W.2d 69 (1975)). No. 2023AP2377-CR 9 ¶18 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1013559 - 2025-09-25