Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26141 - 26150 of 89051 for v n.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
directed.” See No. 2017AP134-CR 7 Hamiel v. State, 92 Wis. 2d 656, 665, n.4, 285 N.W.2d 639
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201775 - 2017-11-09

[PDF] CA Blank Order
entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP824 State of Wisconsin v. Eugene Theodore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353433 - 2021-04-06

[PDF] NOTICE
is not clearly erroneous based on this record. State v. Knight, 168 Wis. 2d 509, 514 n.2, 484 N.W.2d 540
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36539 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694. Prejudice must be “affirmatively prove[n].” State v. Wirts, 176
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32277 - 2008-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2022AP935-CRNM State of Wisconsin v. Darryl E. Mathews (L.C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776115 - 2024-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. CLIFTON LEE WILLIAMS, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129299 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Ordinance’s validity. See Turner v. Taylor, 2003 WI App 256, ¶1 n.1, 268 Wis. 2d 628, 673 N.W.2d 716
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390576 - 2021-07-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
previously. State v. Starks, 2013 WI 69, ¶57, 349 Wis. 2d 274, 833 N.W.2d 146. “[N]o hearing is required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183363 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2022AP935-CRNM State of Wisconsin v. Darryl E. Mathews (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=776115 - 2024-03-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. RYAN PATRICK MCKEOWN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=829611 - 2024-07-24