Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26161 - 26170 of 29823 for des.

Frontsheet
a justice of this court from participation in pending cases have become motions de jour. Currently, nine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44040 - 2010-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS
as unconstitutionally excessive, we review the award de novo. Id., ¶¶47-48. However, we do not undertake that review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88089 - 2005-03-31

Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
a question of law which we review de novo. Zinda v. Krause, 191 Wis.2d 154, 176, 528 N.W.2d 55, 63 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11506 - 2005-03-31

State v. Robert Lewis Flynn
is subject to de novo review. Id. at 114. ¶16 Flynn argues that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06

Nu-Pak, Inc. v. Wine Specialties International, Ltd.
We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, using the same standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3967 - 2007-04-30

Karl A. Burg by his legal guardian v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.
. This is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. Peterson v. Midwest Security Ins. Co., 2001
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16450 - 2005-03-31

James Bruno v. Milwaukee County
this court decides de novo. County of Adams v. Romeo, 191 Wis. 2d 379, 383, 528 N.W.2d 418 (1995). ¶7 We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16531 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Mark E. Converse
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20923 - 2006-01-11

2006 WI APP 250
unless they are clearly erroneous but we determine de novo whether those facts demonstrate a knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27071 - 2005-03-31

WI App 61 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2112 Complete Title of...
an opportunity to secure de novo review of the DNR’s WPDES permitting decisions … and to further develop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111239 - 2005-03-31