Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26161 - 26170 of 33987 for dismissed.
Search results 26161 - 26170 of 33987 for dismissed.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
county were dismissed and read-in at sentencing. The court sentenced Schmidt to twenty years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12
county were dismissed and read-in at sentencing. The court sentenced Schmidt to twenty years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205687 - 2017-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by a felon, and the remaining counts were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208752 - 2018-02-22
by a felon, and the remaining counts were dismissed and read in for sentencing purposes. Laws
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208752 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
endangering safety. In exchange, the State requested that the court dismiss the remaining charge of felon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111148 - 2017-09-21
endangering safety. In exchange, the State requested that the court dismiss the remaining charge of felon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111148 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christ Groh
concentration (PAC). See § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), Stats. On the State’s motion, the court dismissed the PAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
concentration (PAC). See § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), Stats. On the State’s motion, the court dismissed the PAC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14635 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael B. Ilkka
service of that sentence. Making a special appearance, Ilkka moved to dismiss the motion, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31
service of that sentence. Making a special appearance, Ilkka moved to dismiss the motion, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16175 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee Post #2874 v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
judgment to the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (RACM), dismissing its challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
judgment to the Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee (RACM), dismissing its challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4093 - 2005-03-31
Badger Enterprises, Inc. v. Debra L. HinesVennie
Upon the court’s holding that Karaszy was the sole director, the trial court properly dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4514 - 2005-03-31
Upon the court’s holding that Karaszy was the sole director, the trial court properly dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4514 - 2005-03-31
Gary and Lisa Marifke v. Aluminum Industries Corp.
judgment before the plaintiffs-homeowners explained their claims. It argues that the dismissal prejudices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
judgment before the plaintiffs-homeowners explained their claims. It argues that the dismissal prejudices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13264 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roger M. Smejkal
and misdemeanor theft of moveable property. The theft charge was eventually dismissed, and on August 13, Smejkal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
and misdemeanor theft of moveable property. The theft charge was eventually dismissed, and on August 13, Smejkal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6600 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
to dismiss and read in charges from two separate criminal cases. The parties agreed to make a joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93808 - 2013-03-04
to dismiss and read in charges from two separate criminal cases. The parties agreed to make a joint
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93808 - 2013-03-04