Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26171 - 26180 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 26171 - 26180 of 69399 for as he.
State v. William T. Anderson
, the arresting officer testified that upon his arrival at the bar he asked the owner if she saw anything improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04
, the arresting officer testified that upon his arrival at the bar he asked the owner if she saw anything improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25720 - 2006-07-04
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
(1)(a) or other mandatory duties, and alleges that he in fact did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10876 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a) or other mandatory duties, and alleges that he in fact did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10876 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. He was given concurrent terms of twelve years’ initial confinement and eight years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
. He was given concurrent terms of twelve years’ initial confinement and eight years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41230 - 2009-09-21
Thomas J. Enders v. Northwoods Inn
of and was slippery when he fell. The Inn’s proprietor, Curt Spencer, testified at his deposition that because Laona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6411 - 2005-03-31
of and was slippery when he fell. The Inn’s proprietor, Curt Spencer, testified at his deposition that because Laona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6411 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lamonte Simmons v. Jeffrey Endicott
Institution. Simmons argues he was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7921 - 2017-09-19
Institution. Simmons argues he was denied his right to confront the witnesses against him. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7921 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
to support the extension and that he was wrongly allowed to represent himself during the commitment hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26123 - 2017-09-21
to support the extension and that he was wrongly allowed to represent himself during the commitment hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26123 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Maceo Sewell, Jr., appeals the judgment entered after he pled guilty to possessing a firearm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731584 - 2023-11-21
Maceo Sewell, Jr., appeals the judgment entered after he pled guilty to possessing a firearm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=731584 - 2023-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
costs in the amount of $10,000. He argues that the circuit court erred when it refused to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
costs in the amount of $10,000. He argues that the circuit court erred when it refused to vacate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35259 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. Williams argues that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335995 - 2021-02-16
orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and for reconsideration. Williams argues that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=335995 - 2021-02-16
Brown County v. Matthew W.G.
§ 51.20, Stats. He claims the trial court failed to consider that his primary need was treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15929 - 2005-03-31
§ 51.20, Stats. He claims the trial court failed to consider that his primary need was treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15929 - 2005-03-31