Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26171 - 26180 of 39129 for c's.
Search results 26171 - 26180 of 39129 for c's.
Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Tonya B.
charge. C. Comply with a visitation schedule established by the [Department]. The court signed an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31
charge. C. Comply with a visitation schedule established by the [Department]. The court signed an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5850 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: SUZANNE C. O’NEILL, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928900 - 2025-03-18
from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon County: SUZANNE C. O’NEILL, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928900 - 2025-03-18
State v. Brian K. Rice
. Section 973.09(1)(a) provides: Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
. Section 973.09(1)(a) provides: Except as provided in par. (c) or if probation is prohibited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6423 - 2005-03-31
Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
on the brief of Andrew C. Ladd of Ladd, Milaeger & Rebholz, LLP of Waukesha. 2004 WI App 62 COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
on the brief of Andrew C. Ladd of Ladd, Milaeger & Rebholz, LLP of Waukesha. 2004 WI App 62 COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6578 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c) (2007-08).[3] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-09-01
. Stat. Rule 809.25(3)(c) (2007-08).[3] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88301 - 2012-10-16
)(b)4. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(c) (2009-10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88301 - 2012-10-16
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general, and David C. Rice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30732 - 2007-11-27
-respondents, the cause was submitted on the brief of J.B. Van Hollen, attorney general, and David C. Rice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30732 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
. 39, 56 (1987) (“[C]riminal defendants have … the right to put before a jury evidence that might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144709 - 2015-07-20
. 39, 56 (1987) (“[C]riminal defendants have … the right to put before a jury evidence that might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144709 - 2015-07-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the approval of the court,” no contest. See WIS. STAT. § 971.06(1)(a)-(c). Thus, the decision whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
to the approval of the court,” no contest. See WIS. STAT. § 971.06(1)(a)-(c). Thus, the decision whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725430 - 2023-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
into the wall. Haugen argued, however, that pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 893.89(4)(c), the statute of repose does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285815 - 2020-09-09
into the wall. Haugen argued, however, that pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 893.89(4)(c), the statute of repose does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285815 - 2020-09-09