Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26171 - 26180 of 63537 for records.
Search results 26171 - 26180 of 63537 for records.
State v. David J. Baertschi
N.W.2d 156 (1979). We conclude the record supports the trial court’s factual determination that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 156 (1979). We conclude the record supports the trial court’s factual determination that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15607 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, Magee has not established a sufficient factual basis for this claim. The record is silent as to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32753 - 2014-09-15
, Magee has not established a sufficient factual basis for this claim. The record is silent as to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32753 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments lacking proper record citation); State v. Flynn, 190 Wis. 2d 31, 39 n.2, 527 N.W.2d 343 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
arguments lacking proper record citation); State v. Flynn, 190 Wis. 2d 31, 39 n.2, 527 N.W.2d 343 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
. American Tool Cos., 222 Wis. 2d 384, 390, 588 N.W.2d 67, 70 (Ct. App. 1998). The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40065 - 2009-09-01
. American Tool Cos., 222 Wis. 2d 384, 390, 588 N.W.2d 67, 70 (Ct. App. 1998). The record supports
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40065 - 2009-09-01
Frontsheet
the plaintiff's counsel and the court remarked they had not received the affidavit. Electronic court records did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115776 - 2014-06-30
the plaintiff's counsel and the court remarked they had not received the affidavit. Electronic court records did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115776 - 2014-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
without a hearing, concluding that the record of the plea proceeding refuted Graham’s contentions.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-16
without a hearing, concluding that the record of the plea proceeding refuted Graham’s contentions.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36772 - 2009-06-16
COURT OF APPEALS
denied Rogstad’s motion to dismiss for reasons stated on the record.[3] The court determined after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
denied Rogstad’s motion to dismiss for reasons stated on the record.[3] The court determined after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144424 - 2015-07-13
CA Blank Order
to file a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95943 - 2013-04-22
to file a response, but he has not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95943 - 2013-04-22
Patricia Hebert v. Thomas J. Hebert
factual findings on facts appearing in the record and that the decision was an unreasonable exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13091 - 2005-03-31
factual findings on facts appearing in the record and that the decision was an unreasonable exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13091 - 2005-03-31
State v. John London Bradshaw
. In placing the stipulation on the record, the trial court asked Bradshaw’s counsel whether the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11676 - 2005-03-31
. In placing the stipulation on the record, the trial court asked Bradshaw’s counsel whether the stipulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11676 - 2005-03-31