Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 59146 for SMALL CLAIMS.
County of Oneida v. Donald L. Clarksen
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. Clarksen claims that information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15606 - 2005-03-31
a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant. Clarksen claims that information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15606 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
from the number of jurors. We see no compelling reason to review Harvey’s constitutional claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
from the number of jurors. We see no compelling reason to review Harvey’s constitutional claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14462 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(am). Przybylski claims that the circuit court did not fairly consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65191 - 2014-09-15
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(am). Przybylski claims that the circuit court did not fairly consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65191 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
was made on the verdict form. Thus, King’s claim is that a mere defect in the verdict form affects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
was made on the verdict form. Thus, King’s claim is that a mere defect in the verdict form affects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79515 - 2012-03-19
[PDF]
No. 2006AP3003
the spoliation of evidence: (1) under what circumstances may evidence crucial to a potential legal claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32406 - 2014-09-15
the spoliation of evidence: (1) under what circumstances may evidence crucial to a potential legal claim
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32406 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a 2000 conviction for robbery. Myartt’s current motion claims that the trial court violated his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36490 - 2009-05-13
a 2000 conviction for robbery. Myartt’s current motion claims that the trial court violated his right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36490 - 2009-05-13
[PDF]
State v. Glen Blanke
his plea and claimed ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8480 - 2017-09-19
his plea and claimed ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8480 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel claim, as procedurally barred by WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4) (2001-02) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28151 - 2014-09-15
counsel claim, as procedurally barred by WIS. STAT. § 974.06(4) (2001-02) and State v. Escalona-Naranjo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28151 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in municipal court on July 10, 2013. Davis filed an answer and counter-claim alleging abuse of process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116169 - 2017-09-21
in municipal court on July 10, 2013. Davis filed an answer and counter-claim alleging abuse of process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116169 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
message he exchanged with the victim after the assault. He claims these messages were “apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68987 - 2011-08-01
message he exchanged with the victim after the assault. He claims these messages were “apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68987 - 2011-08-01