Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 52778 for address.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 52778 for address.
State v. Warren A. Goodman
, if a defendant fails to show the prejudice prong, this court need not address the deficient performance prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
, if a defendant fails to show the prejudice prong, this court need not address the deficient performance prong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10198 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by nineteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses the following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120918 - 2014-09-02
confinement followed by nineteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses the following
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120918 - 2014-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
the conditions were back in 2001. And then, specifically addressing the word “existing,” he explained: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03
the conditions were back in 2001. And then, specifically addressing the word “existing,” he explained: [T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35412 - 2009-02-03
CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
was exercised here, we must address how the exemption affects the priority of liens, as any liens junior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
was exercised here, we must address how the exemption affects the priority of liens, as any liens junior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were admitted, that’s a point that has to be made during the trial when it can be addressed. You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84546 - 2014-09-15
were admitted, that’s a point that has to be made during the trial when it can be addressed. You
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84546 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92057 - 2013-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one. Id., ¶61. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21
not address both prongs if the defendant fails to make a sufficient showing on one. Id., ¶61. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74183 - 2011-11-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135949 - 2015-03-03
, which this court decides de novo. Id. We need not address both prongs of the test if the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135949 - 2015-03-03
COURT OF APPEALS
and addressing the reliability and potential results of specific requested testing. We affirm the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56843 - 2010-12-19
and addressing the reliability and potential results of specific requested testing. We affirm the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56843 - 2010-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sufficient showing on one prong of the Strickland test, a reviewing court need not address the other. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03
a sufficient showing on one prong of the Strickland test, a reviewing court need not address the other. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072834 - 2026-02-03