Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 69399 for as he.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34098 - 2014-09-15
a judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34098 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
] postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Ferguson claimed that he did not enter his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
] postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Ferguson claimed that he did not enter his guilty plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29857 - 2007-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Stokes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34098 - 2013-06-04
of first-degree intentional homicide. He also appeals an order denying postconviction relief. Stokes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34098 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
a hearing, and his appeal now continues. ¶3 Grosskopf’s appellate brief states that he is pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26773 - 2014-09-15
a hearing, and his appeal now continues. ¶3 Grosskopf’s appellate brief states that he is pursuing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26773 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel L. Douglas
respective failures to explain: (1) as a consequence of Truth-in-Sentencing (which abolished parole), he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26205 - 2017-09-21
respective failures to explain: (1) as a consequence of Truth-in-Sentencing (which abolished parole), he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26205 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
required Judge Levine to consider testimony he did not hear. He further argues that Judge Perlich’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41947 - 2014-09-15
required Judge Levine to consider testimony he did not hear. He further argues that Judge Perlich’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 contention that he was sentenced in reliance on inaccurate information, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113225 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 contention that he was sentenced in reliance on inaccurate information, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113225 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Pamela K. Miskulin v. James R. Miskulin
misinformed the court about the availability of records to show the value of “in-kind” payments he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10068 - 2017-09-19
misinformed the court about the availability of records to show the value of “in-kind” payments he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10068 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the October 31, 2022 deadline by one day. Jurjens argues that he did not miss the deadline because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835486 - 2024-08-08
the October 31, 2022 deadline by one day. Jurjens argues that he did not miss the deadline because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835486 - 2024-08-08
[PDF]
Robert Krcma v. Connie Kinsman
and the will was the product of Connie Kinsman’s undue influence. He No. 02-1258 2 argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5246 - 2017-09-19
and the will was the product of Connie Kinsman’s undue influence. He No. 02-1258 2 argues that the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5246 - 2017-09-19