Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 44395 for name change.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 44395 for name change.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
number. If that changes, give your lawyer the new phone number. If you should have an e-mail address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146397 - 2017-09-21
number. If that changes, give your lawyer the new phone number. If you should have an e-mail address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146397 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 213
step in the inquiry for photo arrays has changed and is now whether they are “unnecessarily suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30123 - 2007-09-25
step in the inquiry for photo arrays has changed and is now whether they are “unnecessarily suggestive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30123 - 2007-09-25
[PDF]
State v. Roger Johnson
revitalizes sentencing jurisprudence, it does not make any momentous changes.”). No. 04-0820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7410 - 2017-09-20
revitalizes sentencing jurisprudence, it does not make any momentous changes.”). No. 04-0820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7410 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. William H. Warren
. No. 95-3185-CR -11- A “new factor” that warrants a change in sentence is an event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19
. No. 95-3185-CR -11- A “new factor” that warrants a change in sentence is an event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9982 - 2017-09-19
Duane Lesky v. County of La Crosse
in paragraph #15.” An addendum executed on December 28, 1988, made additional changes not relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-05-09
in paragraph #15.” An addendum executed on December 28, 1988, made additional changes not relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14245 - 2005-05-09
COURT OF APPEALS
not explain the relevance of this testimony, or how it would have changed the outcome of his revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32356 - 2008-04-17
not explain the relevance of this testimony, or how it would have changed the outcome of his revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32356 - 2008-04-17
[PDF]
State v. Tommie Thames
not change the result. When no appeal is taken, all provisions of a judgment, and the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17647 - 2017-09-21
not change the result. When no appeal is taken, all provisions of a judgment, and the findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17647 - 2017-09-21
Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
(5)(i), Stats. The changes to which the dissent points do not call for the circuit court to ignore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2011-10-19
(5)(i), Stats. The changes to which the dissent points do not call for the circuit court to ignore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2011-10-19
State v. Paul Bickler
statement. Zsohar testified that Doreen made the statement, read the statement, made changes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12242 - 2014-10-26
statement. Zsohar testified that Doreen made the statement, read the statement, made changes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12242 - 2014-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As such, § 51.20(1)(am) “functions as an alternative evidentiary path, reflecting a change in circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440123 - 2021-10-12
. As such, § 51.20(1)(am) “functions as an alternative evidentiary path, reflecting a change in circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=440123 - 2021-10-12