Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 26181 - 26190 of 58381 for speedy trial.

COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion without a hearing. He argues: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46797 - 2010-02-08

CA Blank Order
and that his trial counsel was ineffective because he did not adequately explain the plea questionnaire to him
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132842 - 2015-01-08

[PDF] State v. Robert E. Morrison
a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for one count of possession of a controlled substance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8166 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wesley Rathburn v. Dallas
On the day of trial, following extensive discussions,3 the court outlined the issues to be addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5304 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Columbia County Agriculturaland Land Conservation Committee v. Maurice Williams
statutory sections effective May 13, 1994. Because the trial court entered its order on January 20, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7840 - 2017-09-19

State v. Henry Bowles
. § 943.20(1)(b) (1997-98).[1] He asserts that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14877 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. This no-merit appeal followed. The no-merit report first considers whether the trial court erred in denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110011 - 2017-09-21

Columbia County Agriculturaland Land Conservation Committee v. Maurice Williams
). Appellants argue that the trial court erred by immediately acting on the amended petition in that such action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7840 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
. Alexander L. Jacobus appeals from an order in which the trial court denied his petition for a writ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8266 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven Schelk
of cocaine contrary to § 961.41(3g)(c), Stats. Schelk argues on appeal that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13485 - 2005-03-31