Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 69261 for as he.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 69261 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
to a sentence he was already serving. The trial court instead imposed a forty-two-month concurrent sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
to a sentence he was already serving. The trial court instead imposed a forty-two-month concurrent sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28072 - 2007-02-12
City of Ripon v. Bruce M. Briskie
of the City of Ripon Police Department. ¶3 Fredin testified that at 11:00 p.m. on December 20, 2001, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5868 - 2005-03-31
of the City of Ripon Police Department. ¶3 Fredin testified that at 11:00 p.m. on December 20, 2001, he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
of second-degree sexual assault. See § 940.225(2)(d), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
of second-degree sexual assault. See § 940.225(2)(d), STATS. He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relief. He contends that the County failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132821 - 2017-09-21
relief. He contends that the County failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132821 - 2017-09-21
State v. James M. Baldauf
was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered because he appeared pro se and did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5079 - 2005-03-31
was not knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily entered because he appeared pro se and did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5079 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
respective periods of confinement and extended supervision to run consecutive to a sentence he was already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28072 - 2014-09-15
respective periods of confinement and extended supervision to run consecutive to a sentence he was already
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28072 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert E. Christophel
of February 12, 2000). Christophel’s handwritten notice of appeal indicates that he appeals “from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
of February 12, 2000). Christophel’s handwritten notice of appeal indicates that he appeals “from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4156 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Christophel
2000). Christophel’s handwritten notice of appeal indicates that he appeals “from the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4156 - 2017-09-20
2000). Christophel’s handwritten notice of appeal indicates that he appeals “from the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4156 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
hearing was held March 27, 2007. Only Behnke testified. He said his trial attorney was dismissive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04
hearing was held March 27, 2007. Only Behnke testified. He said his trial attorney was dismissive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31738 - 2008-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
and the order denying his motion for postdisposition relief. He contends that the County failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132821 - 2015-01-12
and the order denying his motion for postdisposition relief. He contends that the County failed to show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132821 - 2015-01-12