Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 3970 for davi.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 3970 for davi.
COURT OF APPEALS
a contemporaneous objection at trial to preserve an issue for appellate review. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
a contemporaneous objection at trial to preserve an issue for appellate review. See State v. Davis, 199 Wis. 2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110486 - 2014-04-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86080 - 2014-09-15
, flagrant.’” Sentry Ins. v. Davis, 2001 WI App 203, ¶21 n.8, 247 Wis. 2d 501, 634 N.W.2d 553 (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86080 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) (quoting State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 781-82, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992)); see also State v. Davis, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
) (quoting State v. Borrell, 167 Wis. 2d 749, 781-82, 482 N.W.2d 883 (1992)); see also State v. Davis, 2005
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173768 - 2017-09-21
Larry A. Wynhoff v. Gary S. Vogt
; in such a case the delivery becomes absolute.’” Ritchie v. Davis, 26 Wis. 2d 636, 644, 133 N.W.2d 312 (1965
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14994 - 2005-03-31
; in such a case the delivery becomes absolute.’” Ritchie v. Davis, 26 Wis. 2d 636, 644, 133 N.W.2d 312 (1965
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14994 - 2005-03-31
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. Mac Davis, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. Mac Davis, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.’” Id., ¶18 (quoting Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006)). Statements are “‘testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
.’” Id., ¶18 (quoting Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813, 822 (2006)). Statements are “‘testimonial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John A. Seitz v. Waukesha County
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9550 - 2017-09-19
an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: J. MAC DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9550 - 2017-09-19
Certification
. Davis, No. 2006AP1954-CR. Background Shawn Harris moved to suppress inculpatory statements he made while
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29495 - 2007-06-27
. Davis, No. 2006AP1954-CR. Background Shawn Harris moved to suppress inculpatory statements he made while
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29495 - 2007-06-27
State v. Thomas D. Gogin
and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2857 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: j. mac davis, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
are proper factors for consideration. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶13, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25
are proper factors for consideration. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶13, 281 Wis. 2d 118, 698 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25