Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 29714 for des.

Michael J. Schultz v. Village of Stoddard
standard of review to the Board of Appeals’ decision and should have reviewed the Board’s decision de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24564 - 2006-03-22

WI App 66 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1650 Complete Title of...
the circuit court’s decision de novo.” State ex rel. Milwaukee Police Ass’n v. Jones, 2000 WI App 146, ¶11
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111596 - 2014-06-24

Alisa Zehetner v. Chrysler Financial Company, LLC
). Although we value a circuit court’s analysis, we review a grant or denial of summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6548 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶10 Similarly, whether a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238712 - 2019-04-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05

Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 794, 666 N.W.2d 859. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19987 - 2005-10-19

[PDF] State v. Barry A. Bullard
conduct presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3339 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Willy J. Love
performance is deficient or, if so, there is prejudice, is a question of law that this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16164 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
5 demand for trial de novo. On April 15, 2015, following a court trial that took place on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173219 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
under the clearly erroneous standard, but this court reviews de novo No. 2015AP1487-CR 4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172252 - 2017-09-21