Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 29796 for des.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 29796 for des.
[PDF]
Joseph P. LaPere v. June Gengler
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Heinritz v. Lawrence Univ., 194 Wis.2d 606, 610, 535 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15356 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Heinritz v. Lawrence Univ., 194 Wis.2d 606, 610, 535 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15356 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher M. Antonicci
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Franklin, 2004 WI 38, ¶5, 270 Wis. 2d 271, 677 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7277 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, which we generally review de novo. Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179, 183, 564 N.W.2d 735 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29242 - 2014-09-15
, which we generally review de novo. Tannler v. DHSS, 211 Wis. 2d 179, 183, 564 N.W.2d 735 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29242 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See ibid. “If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See ibid. “If the terms of the contract are plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26695 - 2006-10-09
State v. Keith S. Betts
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4538 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶10 Similarly, whether a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238712 - 2019-04-10
review de novo. Id., ¶30. ¶10 Similarly, whether a WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion is sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238712 - 2019-04-10
[PDF]
Dean Medical Center v. April Conners
a trial de novo in the circuit court. The circuit court concluded that Fields was liable to Dean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15854 - 2017-09-21
a trial de novo in the circuit court. The circuit court concluded that Fields was liable to Dean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15854 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Additional facts are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
. Additional facts are provided as necessary in the discussion section. DISCUSSION ¶6 We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44175 - 2009-12-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
a restitution award.3 On de novo review, the circuit court ordered restitution for certain discrete items
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363232 - 2021-05-05
Debra S. F. v. Richard F. B.
to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 794, 666 N.W.2d 859. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19987 - 2005-10-19
to de novo review. State v. Meeks, 2003 WI 104, ¶19, 263 Wis. 2d 794, 666 N.W.2d 859. “[S]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19987 - 2005-10-19