Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 4487 for kid.
Search results 2621 - 2630 of 4487 for kid.
State v. Thomas Deffke
, the affiants stated that Deffke knew that “drinking by kids was going on.” One juvenile stated that Deffke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9073 - 2005-03-31
, the affiants stated that Deffke knew that “drinking by kids was going on.” One juvenile stated that Deffke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that he felt that sex education is taught sooner to kids and expressed his belief that parents should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812731 - 2024-06-12
that he felt that sex education is taught sooner to kids and expressed his belief that parents should
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812731 - 2024-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to “present himself well, and [then] on the other side of it whenever he got these kids alone, sexually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01
to “present himself well, and [then] on the other side of it whenever he got these kids alone, sexually
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=684095 - 2023-08-01
[PDF]
State v. Tyler W. P.
of days. ¶5 Patrick’s testimony was a bit different. For example, Patrick had different kids
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4198 - 2017-09-19
of days. ¶5 Patrick’s testimony was a bit different. For example, Patrick had different kids
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4198 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not in contempt. The State offered proof of contempt by presenting the KIDS account statement, which reflected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277239 - 2020-08-12
was not in contempt. The State offered proof of contempt by presenting the KIDS account statement, which reflected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277239 - 2020-08-12
[PDF]
State v. Aaron S.W.
of the offense, which it said "cannot be minimized." We are not talking about two kids fighting in the school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11615 - 2017-09-19
of the offense, which it said "cannot be minimized." We are not talking about two kids fighting in the school
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11615 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
)(a). In modifying placement of Charlie, the trial court found that Charlie was a “good kid” and a “normal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
)(a). In modifying placement of Charlie, the trial court found that Charlie was a “good kid” and a “normal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36778 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Maurice Simmons
“be out for [his] kids.” Simmons testified that he wanted to go to trial because he was not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18374 - 2017-09-21
“be out for [his] kids.” Simmons testified that he wanted to go to trial because he was not guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18374 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the kids here in court, and it’s not relevant what they looked like back then. …. The Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42188 - 2014-09-15
the kids here in court, and it’s not relevant what they looked like back then. …. The Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42188 - 2014-09-15
State v. Maurice Simmons
that a plea would be “the best thing” and he would “be out for [his] kids.” Simmons testified that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06
that a plea would be “the best thing” and he would “be out for [his] kids.” Simmons testified that he wanted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18374 - 2005-06-06